« Lendingclub - bad mathProsper.com - late loan statistics update »

Trackback address for this post

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.
Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

4 comments

Comment from: fred93 [Member] Email
Done. I didn't say at the beginning that they
were Cushie's words, because feeds that grab
the first paragraph or two as an excerpt would
then miss the nice opening. Hopefully the indent
makes it clearer.
12/21/07 @ 22:42
Comment from: Ferrix [Member] Email
You may want to edit the above to make it clear from the outset that the whole post is a quote. Casual readers will think you are the one speaking.
12/21/07 @ 23:14
Comment from: mr1776 [Member] Email
That was a little confusing until the end.
I know there was no "Fred93" posting on the old forums! ;-)

I do not agree completely with Cushie06, either. Though Prosper's actions were wrong, dishonest, and heavy-handed; censorship, per se, is not bad in this context.

I fully expect any decent forum to censor spam and gratuitously offensive material.

Further, a company has no obligation to host negative posts and might even be smart to remove all but the most constructive criticism. Of course, such policies should be clear, up-front, and honestly applied -- which Prosper has repeatedly failed to do.
12/22/07 @ 00:15
Comment from: PrivateLender [Member] Email
The sole reason I'm a member of Prosper is to lend my hard-earned money to worthy borrowers who are likely to pay back their loans (I don't always get this right, but I keep learning from my mistakes and trying a do a better job the next time I bid on a listing). The Prosper Forums and Prosper events are a nice added touch, but they are not the reason I'm on Prosper.

Although the moderation of the new Prosper Forums is uneven at best (e.g., sometimes embedded links are allowed and sometimes they are not), they are a vast improvement over the old Forums. The old Forums were degenerating into a hate-fest against certain participants:

(1) Optimists who prefer to see the Prosper glass as half-full rather than half-empty found themselves to be the target of ad-hominem attacks because they don't have a "Prosper sucks" attitude.

(2) Group leaders who don't kiss butt found themselves at the receiving end of a lot of verbal abuse because they don't grovel at the expectation of some of the other participants.

Those who enjoy Celebrations of the First Amendment are in luck because there are many "Let's Bash Prosper" sites starting to sprout up all over the Internet. If you visit some of these sites and are an optimist, however, you might want to keep your positive outlook to yourself because many participants won't want to learn that Prosper is doing a lot more things right than it is doing wrong.

Have a Happy Holidays and a Prosperous New Year. Or should that be "a -------ous New Year" (just kidding).
12/23/07 @ 20:42

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.