Prospers.ORG Prosper Forum
March 15, 2010, 01:39:22 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Prospers.ORG
 
  Wiki   Forum home   Help Search Groups Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Fred93 blog - Prosper.com is near bankruptcy  (Read 2039 times)
Urbi_et_Orbi
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5853


Suspended Since 9/3/2009


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #60 on: February 01, 2010, 08:58:47 PM »

Good.  Keep her busy communicating directly with a bunch of individual lenders.

 Cheesy
Logged

The Joker: http://i49.tinypic.com/2qwl82o.jpg
"I don't have an anti-Prosper agenda.  Prosper has an anti-lender agenda." - Mothandrust
Si vis pacem, para bellum
christoofar215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4850


Philly - We invented the word "YO" :-/


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #61 on: February 01, 2010, 09:17:19 PM »

Quote
...becoming subject to a bankruptcy or similar proceeding.

What proceedings are similar to bankruptcy?

A wind-down---which is what happens when a VC company that's mostly run off capital injections burns through all of its cash but isn't sitting on a mountain of debt (so outside creditors have claim to very little).   It's up to the VC partners then what to do.


AFAIK, Prosper didn't go out and borrow tons of money (because nobody would lend it to CL).   Prosper probably just has your run of the mill corporate small business debt but the loans are not part of that.   That's "committed cash" which just flows through Prosper but legally that money has to be distributed to lenders.

The VC injections are just that--injections by the "real" owners into the business.  They aren't creditors, either.   In a wind down CL would be stepping aside while the physical assets of the company are sold off (desks/chairs).   Prosper loses its office lease and then the platform has to be taken over by a custodian.   Because there's a bunch of different versions of the Lending Agreement floating around, it remains to be seen what realistically becomes of all the loans ex-post-bankrupt-o.I dunno, maybe I'm wrong.    There's the whole question of the secondary market as well.   Another big nightmare.
Logged

Fred93
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2353



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #62 on: February 01, 2010, 09:51:30 PM »

AFAIK, Prosper didn't go out and borrow tons of money (because nobody would lend it to CL).   Prosper probably just has your run of the mill corporate small business debt but the loans are not part of that.   That's "committed cash" which just flows through Prosper but legally that money has to be distributed to lenders.

The quarterly report says there's $1.7M of liabilities (including accounts payable, long term debt, etc), and the most recent investment from  Nigel Morris took the form of a "bridge loan".  This loan is intended to be converted to stock when a bigger investor comes along.  However if no bigger investor comes along, then Morris' investment is a loan, and they would enter bankruptcy with $1.7M+$1M of liabilities in addition to the "notes" sold to the lender members.  

Of course that $1.7M number was as of Sept 30, 2009.  Might be higher now.

So yea, you're right, they didn't borrow "tons" of money, but they do have nontrivial liabilities.
Logged

112233
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 12174


Suspended since 01/04/2008


View Profile WWW

Ignore
« Reply #63 on: February 01, 2010, 10:10:01 PM »

bridge to nowhere
Logged

moremoneymarc
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2249


Posts for Pro$pers.ORG use only +subject to recall


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #64 on: February 03, 2010, 07:02:43 AM »

What would be the "canary in the coal mine" first indicator of imminent disaster?  Would there just be a bk filing or would bank withdrawals cease without warning preceeding a bk?   is claw back of transferred money for a time period a concern?
Logged
The_Cat
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 663



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #65 on: February 03, 2010, 09:28:18 AM »

What would be the "canary in the coal mine" first indicator of imminent disaster?  Would there just be a bk filing or would bank withdrawals cease without warning preceeding a bk?   is claw back of transferred money for a time period a concern?

Marc,

We have already seen canary indicators IMO. The actions to censor first adopters, the actions to purge any transparency. The whole SEC mess. The inflated return claims. Turnover at the senior leadership levels. I could go on but it is clear to me this is a company which could close at any moment without warning and I don't need to see the financials make this statement. The actions of the company appear increasingly desperate.
Logged
onthefence
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4769



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #66 on: February 04, 2010, 03:49:03 PM »

What would be the "canary in the coal mine" first indicator of imminent disaster?  Would there just be a bk filing or would bank withdrawals cease without warning preceeding a bk?   is claw back of transferred money for a time period a concern?

Taking out loans using the lenders loans as collateral.
Logged

Lobby permission granted
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!