Prospers.ORG Prosper Forum
December 04, 2008, 02:59:00 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Prospers.ORG
 
  Wiki   Forum home   Help Search Groups Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Interesting read  (Read 950 times)
ira01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4319


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #15 on: August 28, 2008, 05:40:02 PM »

Shouldn't that read "It'll cost you just a snickers"?
Logged
onthefence
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2187



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #16 on: August 29, 2008, 08:10:55 PM »

I thought Prosper said they had a third party servicer from the start?
I asked that question early on in the process.  The answer was that they had already contracted with someone to take over servicing the loans in the event they went under.  The documentation is out there somewhere in the old forums.
Logged

mhs505
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1881



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #17 on: August 30, 2008, 11:28:52 PM »

I thought Prosper said they had a third party servicer from the start?
I asked that question early on in the process.  The answer was that they had already contracted with someone to take over servicing the loans in the event they went under.  The documentation is out there somewhere in the old forums.

Perhaps that relationship has been broken?   
Logged
Urbi_et_Orbi
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3037



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2008, 12:32:43 AM »

I thought Prosper said they had a third party servicer from the start?
I asked that question early on in the process.  The answer was that they had already contracted with someone to take over servicing the loans in the event they went under.  The documentation is out there somewhere in the old forums.

Perhaps that relationship has been broken?   

It's clearly spelled out in the SEC filing related to the secondary market, in the event we decide to believe what Prosper put into it.

The plan involves a skeleton crew of Prosper employees.
Logged
mhs505
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1881



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #19 on: August 31, 2008, 02:23:55 AM »


It's clearly spelled out in the SEC filing related to the secondary market, in the event we decide to believe what Prosper put into it.

The plan involves a skeleton crew of Prosper employees.

So, I am lost.  Why did someone earlier think that PMI is now looking for a third party servicer?
Logged
Xenon481
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1469


Feeling Gassy


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #20 on: August 31, 2008, 02:25:45 AM »


It's clearly spelled out in the SEC filing related to the secondary market, in the event we decide to believe what Prosper put into it.

The plan involves a skeleton crew of Prosper employees.

So, I am lost.  Why did someone earlier think that PMI is now looking for a third party servicer?

You didn't read the 2nd post of this thread?
Logged

NewHorizon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1845


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #21 on: September 05, 2008, 02:29:20 PM »

Quote
Lendingclub.com has a third- party servicer that would administer the loans if it went out of business. Prosper.com says it's looking for one.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=a7LI2Jh3XdHM&refer=home

I talked to Cameron @ Prosper today.  He's pretty sure Bloomberg was mistaken with that "looking for one" comment.  I asked him if he could send exacting details on how the post-Prosper Prosper loans would be serviced - details that could be made public.  He said he'd research further and relay what he could.  So I'm thinking I'll see something from him in a week or so.  Or maybe it'll show up in a near-future Prosper blog.
Logged
Urbi_et_Orbi
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3037



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #22 on: September 05, 2008, 03:46:22 PM »

It is outlined in the SEC filing, unless they are planning to amend it.   Grin
Logged
112233
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6493



View Profile WWW

Ignore
« Reply #23 on: September 05, 2008, 03:52:35 PM »

It is outlined in the SEC filing, unless they are planning to amend it.   Grin
if so, wait for the amendment to the amendment
Logged

onthefence
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2187



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #24 on: September 05, 2008, 03:54:04 PM »

It is outlined in the SEC filing, unless they are planning to amend it.   Grin
if so, wait for the amendment to the amendment
Wouldn't it be easier if we just called up Prosper Bank and asked them what the heck they are doing?
Logged

Urbi_et_Orbi
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3037



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #25 on: September 05, 2008, 03:56:49 PM »

It is outlined in the SEC filing, unless they are planning to amend it.   Grin
if so, wait for the amendment to the amendment
Wouldn't it be easier if we just called up Prosper Bank and asked them what the heck they are doing?

Great idea.  Also, please ask them about the collection status on my loans.
Logged
Fred93
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1453



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #26 on: September 06, 2008, 12:27:22 AM »

Quote
“Most loans are very serious transactions; lenders need to be licensed and loan brokers need to be registered,” Lund said. “Is there a security associated with the [Prosper.com] loans? My concerns would be as much for the investors as for the borrower.”

There's an aspect of that statement that sticks out and no one else seems to have commented on.  Its the part where he uses the words "most" and "serious".  Remember this is some kind of state lending regulator guy speaking.  How do we read his meaning when he says "most"?

Most loans are very serious transactions ... but ... there are these others that are just playtime ha ha?

Is he saying something about prosper, or saying that in general some loans are not serious, or ...
Logged

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!