Prospers.ORG Prosper Forum
March 11, 2010, 03:14:52 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Prospers.ORG
 
  Wiki   Forum home   Help Search Groups Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 14   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Prosper Lenders Retain Legal Counsel  (Read 19524 times)
HollowOak
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5173



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #30 on: June 24, 2008, 08:41:21 PM »

There once was a famous quotation. I regret if I paraphrase it incorrectly.

"Dear xxxx, I am in the smallest room in my house. I have your letter in front of me. Soon it will all be behind me."
Logged

Old Stump
My blog
The_Cat
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 663



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #31 on: June 24, 2008, 08:44:28 PM »

This would be so funny if it wasn't so sadly true.

Perhaps the suit could become class action. I'd like to recover a few bucks too.
Logged
beerbud1
Guest

« Reply #32 on: June 24, 2008, 08:46:28 PM »

This would be so funny if it wasn't so sadly true.

Perhaps the suit could become class action. I'd like to recover a few bucks too.
If a lawsuit is brought it will definitely be a "Class Action", You will have the opportunity to opt-in, if you so choose.
Logged
regeneration
Full Member
***
Posts: 222



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #33 on: June 24, 2008, 08:48:00 PM »

Secret forum..lol
Had to laugh when i saw the #1 poster was nonattender

Just to clarify, my participation there was to facilitate communication.  I'm not otherwise involved.

At the request of the some of the members of that group, I was asked to reach out to Prosper for
a dialogue.  I secured a direct offer from Chris Larsen to speak or even meet with the lenders who
were involved with the group.  I'm guessing that they intentionally decided not to talk to the CEO,
and to hold out for some kind of written response.  That's their choice, though I think it mistaken.

Just to clarify, Chris Larsen feigned complete ignorance of the nature and seriousness of the concerns raised in the letter and was likely milking Nonattender for information about the status of any potential legal challenge. 
Logged
bamalucky
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 22089



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #34 on: June 24, 2008, 08:56:58 PM »

Secret forum..lol
Had to laugh when i saw the #1 poster was nonattender

Just to clarify, my participation there was to facilitate communication.  I'm not otherwise involved.

At the request of the some of the members of that group, I was asked to reach out to Prosper for
a dialogue.  I secured a direct offer from Chris Larsen to speak or even meet with the lenders who
were involved with the group.  I'm guessing that they intentionally decided not to talk to the CEO,
and to hold out for some kind of written response.  That's their choice, though I think it mistaken.

You have something brown on your nose  Ninja!
Logged

There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
112233
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 12143


Suspended since 01/04/2008


View Profile WWW

Ignore
« Reply #35 on: June 24, 2008, 09:16:56 PM »

Secret forum..lol
Had to laugh when i saw the #1 poster was nonattender

Just to clarify, my participation there was to facilitate communication.  I'm not otherwise involved.

At the request of the some of the members of that group, I was asked to reach out to Prosper for
a dialogue.  I secured a direct offer from Chris Larsen to speak or even meet with the lenders who
were involved with the group.  I'm guessing that they intentionally decided not to talk to the CEO,
and to hold out for some kind of written response.  That's their choice, though I think it mistaken.
dialogue is great but ..

Prosper needs to reach out to us, not us to them. We don't owe Mr Larsen anything. He knows where to find us if he wants to.

The non-response to the letter speaks volumes actually. I'm glad people were saved from wasting their time being hand-fed BS
Logged

mofo
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 83


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #36 on: June 24, 2008, 09:18:00 PM »

Has PMI compensated lenders for over-charging on collections fees when the transition to AmSher was made ? I wrote to complain many months ago that I was charged a 17% collections fee when it should have been 15%. PMI said they were working on it. To the best of my knowledge, I've never been compensated.

If not, perhaps that could be added to the official complaint.
Logged
xraider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4518


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #37 on: June 24, 2008, 09:22:18 PM »

mofo, it's in the letter, last section:

Quote
Prosper unilaterally decided to move collections away from Penncro to AmSher, which charges lenders a higher fee.  At the time of this switch, Prosper promised that lenders would not be charged more than they would have been had the loans remained at Penncro.  After it was pointed out to Prosper that notwithstanding its promise, lenders were actually being charged the higher AmSher fees, Prosper stated that this was due to a "coding error," and that Prosper would reimburse lenders the over charges.  Apparently, no such reimbursement has yet occurred, despite months having passed.  Demand is hereby made that Prosper immediately provide that reimbursement to lenders.
Logged

Suspended since January 14, 2010 for having the audacity to criticize deadbeat borrowers for failing to pay their loans.  I guess telling deadbeats I'm glad I wasn't stuck on their defaulted loans is considered "harassment" by Prosper.
mofo
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 83


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #38 on: June 24, 2008, 09:24:33 PM »

Would it be a bad idea for individual lenders to file complaints with their respective state attorneys general providing information like that put forth in the letter?   
Logged
onthefence
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4764



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #39 on: June 24, 2008, 10:03:38 PM »

http://blog.prosper.com/2008/06/24/borrower-signed-notes/
Quote
We did not have to make this change, as we were not receiving any complaints about the manner in which the notes have been signed.

Rarely does a judge file a formal complaint with prosper customer service when he or she dismisses your case for lack of evidence.
Logged

Lobby permission granted
onthefence
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4764



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #40 on: June 24, 2008, 10:07:01 PM »

Logged

Lobby permission granted
onthefence
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4764



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #41 on: June 24, 2008, 10:16:20 PM »

I wish Prosper would read this article & get a clue:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080518/news_1n18sorry.html
Logged

Lobby permission granted
Xenon481
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2804

Feeling Gassy


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #42 on: June 24, 2008, 10:23:53 PM »

I have attempted to post a new thread on the official .com forums containing the opening section of the original post in this thread.  We will see if it passes moderation.
Logged

Heavens2Murgetroid
Newbie
*
Posts: 35


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #43 on: June 24, 2008, 10:38:20 PM »

not even a "hey, we got your letter but we need some more time to respond" ??

I guess that was prosper's way of saying take that letter and shove it up your fuc....(cough)
Secret forum..lol
Had to laugh when i saw the #1 poster was nonattender

Just to clarify, my participation there was to facilitate communication.  I'm not otherwise involved.

At the request of the some of the members of that group, I was asked to reach out to Prosper for
a dialogue.  I secured a direct offer from Chris Larsen to speak or even meet with the lenders who
were involved with the group.  I'm guessing that they intentionally decided not to talk to the CEO,
and to hold out for some kind of written response.  That's their choice, though I think it mistaken.

You have something brown on your nose  Ninja!

It always seems you want substantive dialogue to devolve.  Why?  Trying to open communication seems like a perfectly reasonable thing.     
Logged
Urbi_et_Orbi
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5830


Suspended Since 9/3/2009


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #44 on: June 24, 2008, 10:59:13 PM »

It always seems you want substantive dialogue to devolve.  Why?  Trying to open communication seems like a perfectly reasonable thing.     

Have you ever actually been a party to one of the sessions where Prosper promised substantive dialogue?
Logged

The Joker: http://i49.tinypic.com/2qwl82o.jpg
"I don't have an anti-Prosper agenda.  Prosper has an anti-lender agenda." - Mothandrust
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 14   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!