And so it begins, the taking out of loans by Prosper when the only significant asset that can be taken are the loans obtained by lenders "investors".
$4,919,588 in loans have been generated since July 2009 under the new lender investor agreement. If/when Prosper goes south, I don't see how Nigel Morris has any less of a claim to these funds than Prosper's lenders investors.
I agree. It seems to me that Morris and the Prosper 3.0 "lenders/investors" would be unsecured creditors on equal footing. So if Prosper went BK tomorrow after blowing Morris's $1M, even if every Prosper 3.0 borrower paid their loans in full, those "lenders/investors" would only receive 83% of their money, while Morris would get the other 17%.