I'm not sure who bama wants to whack here, HO, zcommodore, or both...
While I in no way defend the results of zcommodore's group, I'll say that $500 that he lent was out of $1850 on total loans; 27% of all the cash he loaned.
I don't know what the median is for cash loaned to groups as a percentage of all cash loaned; but 27% sounds fairly reasonable...
I suspect, but am much too lazy at this point to try to find out myself, that group loans in which the group leader bid a higher percent of his or her total cash may be better performers. It stand to reason.
A long time ago, when I was still into Prosper and was picking islandmele's brain for ideas on how to run a group, she mentioned that half of her money was in her own group. So 50% might be a good benchmark of commitment.
But 27% isn't too shabby. zcommodore certainly wasn't out to screw anyone. His mistakes were the same mistakes most people were making; trusting flakes on the internet.
As for HO, it comes across as an assessment (which is kind of a Hollow Oak forte, assessing things...) It doesn't come across as especially "nasty"; just his analysis and assessment, in his own usual voice. I don't agree with the implication that zcommodore didn't put enough of his money into his own group. However, I don't think HO is being unduly mean in drawing his own conclusions... I guess it's up to zcommodore how or if he wants to respond to HO...