Print

[NewHorizon]

K.  Thanks guys. 
I never got any message from Prosper about opting in or out of the NAT.
So that shudda been my first clue.   

[zcommodore]

I think this started out as an good thread, suitable for the lobby.  I'd hate to see the whole thing moved over this noise distraction, but perhaps the thread should be split?

I've already reported the thread to the moderator to have it split (again!).  Yes, this is the second time this thread has drifted.

[Caladia]

I think this started out as an good thread, suitable for the lobby.  I'd hate to see the whole thing moved over this noise distraction, but perhaps the thread should be split?

I've already reported the thread to the moderator to have it split (again!).  Yes, this is the second time this thread has drifted.

I split off the earlier tangent ("May 9 discussion - 'personal insults'") to here: http://www.prospers.org/forum/may_9_discussion_personal_insults_split_frm_repurchased_loans_the_list-t7343.0.html

And the more recent tangent ("Personal Insult Discussion")to here:
http://www.prospers.org/forum/personal_insult_discussion_split_from_repurchased_loans_the_list-t7339.0.html

[chongman99]

. (Got loan id an listing id mixed up. Sorry. Original message erased.)

[ira01]

I posted in my blog about this but I figured I'd create a thread here about it as well.

http://www.prospers.org/wiki/Repurchases

In summary:
124 loans are marked as "repurchased" by Prosper.
---
10 loans taken out by Victoria Crawford
66 loans in the New Agency Test
48 other loans (some or all may have been fraud of some sort)

As a reminder for newcomers to this thread, there is quite a bit of information about the NAT loans on this page here, including a list of all of the lawsuits we have been able to find so far (which is most of them), and the matching up of those lawsuits (which identify the borrower's full name, among other information) with the loan listing.