OTF, one of the real risks of lawsuits is that judges and their staff do find very relevant things in the paper, online or whatever and it colors their perception of the case. The debtor's lawyer has read the lobby posts on .org, and it wouldn't surprise me one bit if he shares this. It also wouldn't surprise me one bit if the judge or one of his staff is a Motley Fool fan. We've had that type of serendipity before in our cases.
112233, it depends on the judge. Federal judges in particular can get very upset if they think someone is less than respectful of their obligations. If the court learns that the "correction" has resulted from someone being caught, there well may be an order to show cause, requiring an explanation of the (1) basis for the mistake (was it the lawyer's misunderstanding, the client's hubris, something else); and (2) why the party waited so long to correct it after learning about the mistake. If the judge is not satisfied with the explanation, there could be sanctions imposed and/or a report to the state bar. If it's REALLY bad, the lawyer could be suspended from practice before that court. The court could issue a published ruling chiding the party and the lawyer.