Getting rid of Fuller would appear to be good news for Prosper.
Nominate for Lobby, since it's important to also highlight positive developments.
Isn't this only positive if they replace him with someone effective at the task?
Who is that I would wonder...

I'd argue that Doug Fuller has been an unmitigated disaster for Prosper. The fact that someone finally had the backbone to get rid of such a senior-level executive (or he had the decency to finally move on) seems like a net positive to me. He should have been gone a LONG time ago.
In reading the bio of the new guy, it didn't look live what they found is a huge improvement, but he deserves a chance to prove himself, and continuing along the path of Fuller wasn't going anywhere good.
So, this pretty much leaves just Larsen and Inglis leftover from the early regime?